We would like to draw your attention to the screening possibilities of foreign counterparties in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

To reduce risks and check the reliability, solvency and security of your foreign counterparty, you should take the following steps:

• Legal check;
• Financial check;
• Check valid licences, if applicable;
• Check other factors such as publicly available information / business reputation: customer reviews, relationships with partners or contractors.

As part of the legal review of an LLP (Limited Liability Partnership or “TOO”), which acts as a separate legal entity based on its own Charter, you should request the following legal documents:

• Charter;
• Memorandum of Association (however, the counterparty may refuse to provide this as the provisions may be confidential);
• Resolution/protocol on the appointment of the directors;
• State registration certificate – certificate of registration. What to check: Consistency of the information in the certificate with other incorporation documents;
• Business Identification Number (BIN) – a unique number created for a legal entity (branch and representative office) and self-employed persons;
• Registration number of the VAT payer’s certificate.

Also pay attention to the company’s legal address for local authorities. It must be specified in the Charter and other documents when registering the LLP and can be either a commercial premises or a private address (e.g. the founder’s flat).

There are following risk factors:

• “mass registration address”;
• mismatch between the legal and actual addresses (when submitting to the tax office), which is especially relevant for VAT payer counterparties.

The charter capital of an LLP must be at least 100 times the monthly calculate on index (MCI) at the time of submitting the formation documents for state registration. Fr om January 1, 2024, the MCI will be 3,692 tenge, i.e. the minimum capital must be 369,700 tenge (approx. RUB 73,000). The charter capital must be fully paid within one year from the date of registration. For small companies (up to 100 employees, income up to 300,000 MCI/year) there is no minimum capital (it can therefore be 0 tenge).

The executive body can be collective (directorate) or individual (director). An LLP can have several directors who act independently of each other (but only natural persons). 

In addition, we would like to draw your attention to the official regime of “suspension of activity” in the Republic of Kazakhstan (the official analogue of “sleep mode” in the Russian Federation). During suspension, a company cannot conduct any profitable activities, but it is not liquidated and can be reinstated. Information on companies whose activities have been suspended can be obtained from the website of the State Revenue Committee of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan (SRC).

Further, in case the signatory of the contract is a director acting on the basis of the Charter, you should check the following aspects:

• Timeliness of the authorization (the data in the decision / protocol of appointment should coincide with the data in the state registers);
• Duration of the authorization;
• Existence of possible restrictions (e.g. transactions above a certain amount may require the approval of the participants, this may be specified in the Charter);
• Delimitation of powers if there are several directors.

If the signatory of the contract is acting on the basis of a power of attorney, be sure to request and scrutinize it for:

• The authority of the person issuing the power of attorney. If it is not signed by a director, but by another person based on the power of attorney with the right of overriding power of attorney, you should also request and check the original power of attorney;
• Description of the powers of the person acting on the basis of the power of attorney.

Wh ere to get data (open sources):

• Portal of the Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic Kazakhstan (RK).

Here you can find basic information about the company.

• Portal of the State Revenue Committee of the Ministry of Finance of the RK (www.kgd.gov.kz).

Here you can find:

• Details on suspension / non-suspension of activities;
• Information on the absence (presence) of tax arrears;
• Total amount of taxes paid;
• Presence of the counterparty in the List of unreliable taxpayers;
• Information about being / not being in the process of liquidation.

• Portal of the Supreme Court of the RK, Portal of the Ministry of Justice of the RK.

Here you can find the availability of open and past court cases.

• Public procurement portal.

Here you can see if the counterparty is on the list of unfair participants in public procurement.

• Portal of the Electronic Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan Egov.kz.

Here you can find:

• Information about the registered legal entity as of a given date;
• Details of the latest amendments to the constituent documents;
• Information about participation of the legal entity in other legal entities;
• Information on the presence of branches and representative offices of the legal entity;
• Information on the category of the subject of entrepreneurship;
• Data on encumbrances (seizure) on the legal entity’s share;
• Information on recognition of the legal entity as an inactive legal entity or involvement of its participants in inactive legal entities.

Unfortunately, as in many other jurisdictions, to obtain full data from public official sources, in most cases verification or authorization may be required, which requires a local phone number or IIN / BIN (analogue to the Russian TIN). In this regard, it may be necessary to engage a local partner to carry out a full-fledged verification.

For bigger or more significant deals, of course, the financial condition of the counterparty should be checked. For this purpose, it is necessary to request and analyze financial and tax statements for the last reporting periods:

• Balance sheet,
• Profit and Loss Statement,
• Cash flow statement.

Analyzing the financial statements will help to understand how successful and sustainable the company is, and to identify problems / risk factors.

We would also advise you to look at:

• review of financial ratios,
• analysis of current assets and total debt,
• profit and loss analysis,
• and get information about the bank details of the counterparty in advance – not all banks in Kazakhstan accept and send payments to Russia or do so with restrictions on the type of currency / banks from the Russian Federation.

We will be happy to answer your questions and, if necessary, carry out a counterparty check at your request.

Exclusively for the Russian Business Guide magazine, Daria Pogodina, Managing Director of swilar presented a review article “International payment practices in the current environment”.

You can read the article online in Russian or English, or download two-language article in pdf-format by clicking the “Download en” button below the message.

We bring to your attention a review of the latest changes in the procedure for transactions with shares of OOOs with participants from unfriendly countries.

We would like to remind you that any transactions or groups of transactions with securities of Russian legal entities and/or shares constituting the share capital of Russian legal entities require obtaining permits from the Government Commission and performing a number of procedures (obtaining an independent assessment, establishing KPIs, etc.).

On 23.01.2024, Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 22.01.2024 No. 40 “On amendments to the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 06.03.2022 No. 295” (hereinafter – the “Decree No. 40”) was published, which contains some clarifications of the procedure.

Decree No. 40 established the need to comply with certain previously formulated conditions for obtaining permits (see Extract from the decision of the subcommission dated 07.07.2023 No. 171/5) and made some additions.

In particular, it is now established at the regulatory level (clause 5 (1) of the Rules approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 06.03.2022 No. 295, hereinafter – the “Rules”) that the following information must be additionally included in the application for a permit:

• report on an independent assessment of the market value of the relevant securities of Russian legal entities and/or shares constituting the share capital of Russian legal entities.

This assessment must be carried out by an appraiser engaged in private practice and included in the list of appraisers (appraisal organizations) recommended by the subcommission to carry out such an assessment, or by an appraiser who has entered into an employment contract with a legal entity included in such a list (paragraph 3 of clause 1 of Decree No. 40). The right to determine the specified list is granted to the subcommission (clause 8 of Decree No. 40).

• key performance indicators and their target values for buyers, proposed as conditions for the implementation of transactions or a group of transactions.

Decree No. 40 also details the procedure for monitoring the achievement of key performance indicators.

In particular, Decree No. 40 clarifies who will monitor the implementation of the set KPIs (performance indicators). Monitoring of achievement of indicators and their target values will be carried out by:

• federal executive authorities (in each case, the authority will be determined depending on the scope of activity of the legal entity or party to the transaction), and (or)
• the Central Bank of the Russian Federation,

on the basis of documents confirming the achievement of these indicators and their target values, submitted within the time limits established in the decisions of the subcommission (clause 8 of Decree No. 40).

Please note that, in accordance with the clause 5 (2) of the Rules, the requirement to include additional information in the application in the form of an independent assessment report, as well as KPIs, does not apply to transactions and operations:

• between persons included in the same group of persons in accordance with competition law,
• between persons associated with unfriendly countries.

Additionally, you can read our previously published reviews on the topic: on the procedure for issuing permits for transactions with shares in the share capital of OOOs, on the conditions for obtaining permits for transactions with shares in OOOs, as well as on changes to these conditions.

We will be happy to answer your questions!

Please note that all representative offices and branches of foreign companies are required to submit information about the members and beneficiaries of their parent structures to the tax authority by 28.03.2024.

According to the clause 3.2 of the article 23 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federatio , foreign organizations (FO), as well as foreign structures without formation of a legal entity (FSWFLE), are obliged annually no later than March 28:

• to submit information about the members of such a FO (for FSWFLE – information about its founders, beneficiaries and managers) as of December 31 of the year preceding the year of submission of the specified information to the tax authority at the place of their registration, as well as
• to disclose the procedure for indirect participation (if any) of an individual or public company in the event that the share of their direct and/or indirect participation in the FO (FSWFLE) exceeds 5%.

This obligation does not apply to foreign companies that are registered with the Russian tax authorities only because of the provision of services in electronic form, as well as to subsidiaries (OOO) with foreign participation.

The form of communication about the members of a FO (for a FSWFLE – about its founders, beneficiaries and managers), the format of its submission in electronic form, as well as the procedure for filling in the form are approved by the Order of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated 01.12.2021 No. ED-7-13/1046@.

Wrongful failure to submit (untimely submission) by a foreign organization (foreign structure without formation of a legal entity) of the above information to the tax authority entails a fine of 50,000 RUB (clause 2.1 of the article 129.1 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federatio ).

You can find information previously published by us on this topic here.

We will be happy to answer your questions and offer our assistance in creating the report.

Exclusively for the Russian Business Guide magazine, Daria Pogodina, Managing Director of swilar presented a review article “CHANGES IN 2024: Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs), Transfer Pricing, Offshoring and other news” providing detailed step-by-step analysis of the changes and their consequences.

You can read the article online in Russia or English, or download two-language article in pdf-format by clicking the “Download ru” button below the message.

Since Russia has been closely interacting with China in various fields over the past decades, many Russian representatives of small and medium-sized businesses are beginning to actively cooperate with Chinese partners. Russian businessmen who are not aware of the peculiarities of the Chinese mentality may encounter serious difficulties when signing contracts with Asian partners.

In this review we would like to draw your attention to the important features of concluding contracts between partners from Russia and China, which will help you to avoid a number of mistakes:

1. The only official language in China is Chinese. Thus, it is advisable to sign the text of the contract not in Russian and English, but in Russian and Chinese (the official languages of Russia and China).

If the Chinese partners do not insist on this, this can only mean that they do not intend to register the contract with the Chinese government authorities.

2. The name of a Chinese company registered in China can only be in Chinese, and the English name of the company is not legally valid to the full extent Chinese, as well as Russian, courts do not consider claims if the documents do not indicate the real (registered) company names.

3. It is necessary to check the registration of the Chinese company by requesting from the partner a certificate of registration of a legal entity, and also make sure that its representative has the appropriate authority.

It should be kept in mind that only the legal representative of the company has the right to sign a contract without a power of attorney. This may not always be the CEO of the company. The legal representative must be indicated in the certificate of registration of a legal entity.

If someone else signs the contract on the Chinese side, they are required to present a power of attorney. Therefore, when concluding a contract with a Chinese company, it is worth asking the future partner for a power of attorney confirming the authority of the signatory.

4. It is important to check the registration (legal status) of the Chinese seal.

Each Chinese company generally has one main seal, which is strictly controlled. However, to support various types of activities, companies often produce additional types of seals, including “contract seals.” Having produced such seals, Chinese companies often do not amend the registration documents accordingly or otherwise register their legal status.

In this regard, it is recommended to check whether the Chinese partner’s seal is registered by requesting a certificate from the State Commerce and Industry Administration of the government at the place of registration of the Chinese company. It is quite easy to obtain such a certificate, and falsifying it is dangerous for a Chinese partner.

5. To protect yourself, it is recommended to check the company’s website. The site must have a Chinese version, otherwise there is a high chance of encountering scammers. You should check the domain name registration date and ownership.

6. In order to avoid difficulties with the recognition and enforcement of decisions of Russian courts in China, it is recommended to introduce an arbitration clause and include in it one of the well-known institutional arbitration centers in China, for example, the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC), etc.

On the one hand, this will require additional costs for contacting Chinese lawyers or Russian specialists with experience in representing the interests of parties in Chinese arbitration. On the other hand, this will simplify the issue of recognition and enforcement of the decision under the New York Convention of 1958.

If the Chinese partners do not want to resolve the dispute in arbitration due to the high cost of the procedure, then, in order to avoid difficulties with the recognition and execution of decisions of Russian courts in China, it is better to establish a clause for those disputes, for which this is possible, regarding their resolution in a Chinese state court, since Russian courts readily recognize decisions of Chinese courts.